Tuesday, March 22, 2016



The ‘artist’ in me loves graphing.  I could watch my TI-84 draw pictures all day.  I even like homework assignments that force me to graph by hand.  What I DON’T like are instructions that expect me to “calculate” 50 points before “sketching” a graph.  When I just need to imagine what the graph looks like, where it is positive or negative, what direction the end points face, etc, I’m in favor of estimating.  I believe it’s a good practice even when a more specific graph is eventually called for, because I can quickly find silly errors.

Here’s a quick and dirty on finding a few specific points when graphing rational expressions.

1.  FIND VERTICAL ASYMPTOTES by setting the denominator to 0.


2.  FIND THE X-INTERCEPT by setting the numerator to 0.


Notice that both of these tell you something about the X-axis and run left and right in the original equation, like the X-axis does on the graph. 

3.  FIND THE HORIZONTAL ASYMPTOTE by reducing the leading variable. 


4. FIND THE Y-INTERCEPT by reducing the constants.


Notice that these two run up and down like the Y-axis and determine points on the Y-axis.

         Done. Sketched.      

Other conditions tell even more about the graph.

-- Suppose in step 3, the exponent on the denominator’s variable is larger than the one on the numerator.  Think of ‘end behavior,’ what happens way out there at infinity.  If the leading coefficient of the demominator is LARGER than the one in the numerator, the fraction gets very, very small at infinity -- almost nothing.  So the horizontal asymptote is 0.

-- Suppose reducing the leading coefficients leaves a variable in the numerator, like y = x  or  y = x/3.  This indicates a SLANT (or SKEW) ASYMPTOTE, which is not considered “horizontal” even though it goes through the y-axis.  Notice that it also goes through the x-axis. 

-- Suppose there is no constant in the numerator.  Fill in a place holder, 0.  Then the fraction is zero divided by something and equals zero.

-- Suppose there is no constant in the denominator.  Again, fill in a place holder, 0.  The fraction becomes division by zero, which is undefined and the graph never crosses the y-axis.

-- Look at a bunch of rational graphs.  Notice that asymptotes are like the poles of a magnet.  They repel the graph.  The segments separated by the asymptotes act in a similar way.  In MOST (but not all) cases, if the graph is heading up on one side of the asymptote, the other side will NOT follow the same pattern.  Simple rational expressions generally occupy only 2 quadrants formed by the vertical and horizontal asymptotes: I and III, or II and IV.


As problems become more complicated, factoring and reducing become necessary.

       This reduced form gives a vertical asymptote at x = -1, but x can not equal +3 either because it was part of the original equation.  Although there is no vertical barrier at x = 3, the graph will skip over that point and create a hole.


The principle of repulsion....


And some present wierdnesses like part of the graph crossing the horizontal asymptote, looping around, and finally adopting the behavior we expected.  Witness:


--- And another rule breaker....
     How does it get that squiggle?  No vertical asymptote because it's an imaginary number, but a horizontal asymptote at 0.  For X between -sqrt 2 and (roughly) 2.4, the y value is increasing; for all other values it is ever decreasing.   While the numerator can turn negative, the denominator will always be positive. 


--- Here's a cute one that defies the repelling principle.

     Will this graph ever enter negative territory?  Nope.  The fraction will always be positive.


With just a few morsels of data, the general shape of most rational equation graphs can provide valuable information to check more intricate drawings, as well as inform Calculus questions later in math study.

No comments:

Post a Comment